Adjourned Undertaking

Magistrates' Court of Victoria

Prohibited Person possess firearm and possess traffickable quantity of drugs, resolved without imprisonment, CCO or fine

18-month adjourned undertaking with conviction and a $1,000 court fund donation on a 10-year maximum firearm charge.

Magistrates' Court of Victoria · Prohibited Person Possess Firearm · Plea Hearing

Case Snapshot

Court
Magistrates' Court of Victoria
Area
Firearm and drug offences
Stage
Plea hearing
Head charge
Prohibited person possess firearm
Maximum penalty
10 years imprisonment
Other charges
Possess methamphetamine
Possess butanediol
Defence work
Written plea
Oral submissions
Outcome
Adjourned undertaking: 18 months
Court fund donation: $1,000
No imprisonment, CCO or fine

Result: In this anonymised matter, the client was charged with prohibited-person possess firearm, a 10-year maximum offence, alongside a possession of methamphetamine (traffickable quantity) and possess butanediol.

The matter resolved by of a plea of guilty. The Court imposed an 18-month adjourned undertaking with conviction and a $1,000 court fund donation. No imprisonment, Community Corrections Order or fine was imposed.

Case Outcome

Adjourned undertaking
18 months (with conviction)
Court fund donation
$1,000
Imprisonment / CCO / fine
None

Charges

Charge 1: Prohibited Person Possess Firearm

Charge 2: Possess Methamphetamine (Trafficable Quantity)

Charge 3: Possess Butanediol.

The Problem

Sentencing statistics show that majority of those convicted for the charge of ‘prohibited person possessing a firearm’ are sentenced to a term of imprisonment. The accompanying drug possession charges added to the cumulative sentencing position.

Our Approach

A key consideration when sentencing firearms possession offences is whether the firearm is associated with other criminal activity. Where the illegal firearm possession is found to be for a criminal purpose, a more severe sentence is warranted. In this case, our approach focused on establishing a clear distinction between that and the nature of our clients offending. There were no aggravating features, and the firearm was located on a farming property.

Outcome

According to sentencing statistics, only one percent for those sentenced with this offence, receive a fine or less.

Why This Case Matters

This case highlights the importance of having an experienced advocate provide an explanation of the offending, highlight mitigating factors and circumstances and guide the court to reduce the sentence against the odds.

Common Questions

Can a prohibited-person firearm charge be resolved without imprisonment, a CCO or a fine?

Yes. In this anonymised matter, the client was charged with prohibited-person possess firearm, a 10-year maximum offence, alongside a possession of methamphetamine (traffickable quantity) and possess butanediol. The Court imposed an 18-month adjourned undertaking with conviction and a $1,000 court fund donation. No imprisonment, Community Corrections Order or fine was imposed.

Does this result guarantee the same outcome in another case?

No. Each matter depends on its own facts, including the charges, evidence, plea position, criminal history, sentencing material and the Court's assessment. Past outcomes do not guarantee future results.

Charged with a firearm possession offence?

Firearm possession charges carry significant sentencing risk. Early advice can affect plea structure and whether less severe sentencing options remain within range.

FACING A SIMILAR CHARGE?

Speak With a Lawyer About Your Matter

Each matter depends on its own facts. Early legal advice can affect how a criminal matter is prepared, negotiated, or resolved.